Performance evidence
This page exists to tell you what evidence we have and what we do not. The short answer is that today we have no verifiable track record to link, and we would rather say so here than fill it with charts.
What we do publish
None of this is a result. These are figures from the model and from the service, which we can stand behind because they come out of the system.
- The risk sheet for each configuration: how much adverse range it withstands and what floating drawdown it reaches with every layer open.
- Service availability over the last 60 days, with the committed target.
- What the advisor does, parameter by parameter
- What others publish in the community, which is theirs and not ours.
What we will not publish
Even if it looks worse commercially, and even if it is what almost the whole sector does.
- Backtests as proof of performance: a grid optimised over past data produces excellent curves almost always and says nothing about the future.
- Screenshots of unaudited accounts: a screenshot is not verifiable.
- Projected returns: FxCell Pro delivers execution, not forecasts.